★ Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman!

我们需要常常注意到顺序的重要性。比如人的注意力主要集中在交流过程的开始和结尾，如果你要有效的传递信息给别人，无论是谈话还是写信，你可能需要注意顺序方面所起的作用，把你想要引起对方注意的信息放在较为前面。并在之后可能做一个总结，把受众从梦游里面拉出来。

学习也是同样需要注意顺序的，循序渐进此词最为形象的说明了这一过程。让我把它掰开。

首先是循序，遵循一定的顺序进行学习，从易到难，从无知到熟悉门类框架，再到细节的逐渐丰富，甚至最后自己的创新。但是谁来保证我们是在遵循着比较合适的顺序前进呢？一开始是不可能存在的。你可能有比较好的导师Mentor（广义），可以给你的指导，或者提示，使你自己建立起自己的学习顺序，我要强调的是还是要依靠你自己，所以你和你的导师之间还是需要双向的沟通。或者你得到的是一个较为完整的书单等等指导，但是需要注意的是没有一个单向的指导是完全适合你的，能够定义出最为适合你自己的路径只有你自己，当然不是现在的你，而是经过各种不断的修正，内心中的框架渐渐清晰起来的未来的你。

在大多数情况下，你并不能得到太多的指导或者有效的指导，你需要依靠自己，那怎么办，你需要建立起自己的方法论，学习的方法论，可以解释为知识的知识。如果没有帮助，就去寻求帮助，如何寻求帮助也是方法论中重要的部分。时刻保持自己对知识的敏感。

渐进，我理解的渐进就是为了循序前进所奠定的心理基础。如果没有渐进而是激进那么你难以平静下来完成循序前进。

为什么谈论这么多别人可能觉得没有问题的东西，因为这是我的问题。

How do you start a post or composition? I used to try to make the words or sentences I put down almost exactly what they would be finally. However, that makes the process very anoying, even like suffering. You can not think freely, you always worry if you are writing the satisfying content, and at the end of course you do not.

So I decide to adopt another way of writing, brainstorm, modification. But the difficulty is you have to believe it really works, that is to say, you have to drive away all the thought in your mind that you have to write the good content right away. I neglected the chance of modification in the past, and to be honest, I am not used to doing that.

Why I like House?
Because I like the man House.
Why?
Because you will like someone who is similar to you in some aspects, though in fact he may not be like you at all. It is all about how you think of it, not the fact.
What makes you think you are like him in some aspects? Perhaps it is the vanity that drive you think that way.
It is his kind of sense of humor and why he wanna make all those jokes, not mainly for fun, his strong need of being special., his wit, and his philosophy.
I can not completely deny the possibility that it is the vanity who talks, I do not know that very clearly. What I do know is only vanity can not make the passion last so long.

I like reading some well-known textbooks on the fields I am intereted in in that it is based on some serious scientific research and its credibility is assured by the eminent authors of those books, in other words, it is one credible source of knowledge you need.

However I recently realize that the spark, the inspiration, and the completeness of the thought presented in the original materials are seriously damaged in the textbooks after they have been accomodated in the those books, at least they are not so impressive as they used to be, which I suppose may be the most important. Some great ones can also do that, but given the fact that the textbooks have to consider the balance among different disciplines and follow some “textbook patterns” to meet the need of ordinary people, it is almost a collection of dry and boring fact.

My idea here is trying to find the principles in the works of the guru, then putting them into practice to test them, only in that way you will learn. It is a process of rediscovering the truth. And the frame will becoming more and more detailed. You should never expect that you have all the tools prepared to handle the problem.

Getting astray again, ^_

Being sensitive is more than having some kind of ability, it is partly about the attitude whether you are willing to spend your time and energy doing some thinking on the intereting things. Of course you can say that can also be seen as sort of hunch, but my point here is it is not only about if you can, but also about if you want.

Obviously, you have to own some effective ways of identifying which might be the most valuable among the huge amount of thinking work or say setting some sort of priority in case you are drowned in the ocean of the thinking.

If I could, would I tell them what lies ahead?
Would I warn them of the sorrow and betrayal that lie in store?
No.
From where I stand now,
I see enough of the road to understand how it must be traveled.
The trick is to keep moving forward,
to let go of the fear and the regret that slow us down
and keep us from enjoying a journey that will be over too soon.
Yes, there will be unexpected bends in the road,
shocking surprises we didn’t see coming,
but that’s really the point…

快要下班，在qq上碰到姚，回福州第一次网上碰到他，说起上海的同学都混的不错，看来要加把劲了？还是过我自己的方式吧。说起他在上海的药厂找到工作，加油吧

回来的时候碰到柯打电话过来，终于被人发现了，聊的蛮开心的，以前的感觉还是没有变，而且我说话慢了不少。^_，下下周就可以聚聚了。期待，老友好久不见。

晚上又可以看House了，上帝听见我的热线了。

阅读不仅仅是为了收获，也为了愉悦，或者是其他的体验，不仅是结果有价值，过程也体现了价值。

阅读不仅仅取决于本身的载体，也取决与你的知识网络，你的方法论，你的思考深度，你的状态。

从有思想的朋友那里得到的推荐是一笔宝贵的财富，当然需要你的独立的判断力。

对王建硕博客里的这段话深有感触，是用另一种方式表达，比自己更加清晰而深刻的表达了对于阅读的一些想法，摘下来：

聚会回来，收获颇丰。有机会深聊的朋友不多，还有很多慕名而去，却未及详谈，甚至疏于打个招呼，非常遗憾。《旅行的艺术》里面德波顿引用罗斯金的话说：“我们在旅行时，如果我们放弃每小时走１００英里，从从容容地行进，我们或许会变得健康些，快了些或明智些。世界之大，远超过我们的眼界可以容纳的范围，不管人们走得多慢；走得多快，他们也不会看到更多。真正珍贵的东西时所思和所见，不是速度。”　“一个人，如果他的确是个人，走慢点并无害处；因为他的辉煌根本不在于行走，而在于亲身体验”。这段话是在谈旅游，也适用于我们对新的朋友的渴望。世界之大，有深邃思想的人之多，远超过我们可以支配的坐在一起深谈的时间。与其在一次一次的聚会里面，发出成批的名片，换回成堆的名片，还不如静下心来和一两位朋友促膝深谈，因为收获，仅仅和你倾听，思考的时间有关。

－－王建硕

在电脑上看p2p播的老友记，感觉不错，看来还是要看电视，还有一次吃的太多。

Book:

Successful Project Management 2e
IT Project Management 1e
The Art of Project Management

Forum:
www.mymp.net
…

MSN:
Some peers also working on this field

QQ Group:
A Group on the subject of EPM

Technet China/USA
Some valuable video about project management or the Microsoft Enterprise Solution

The Blogs
topic is mainly about project management

Still lots of juicy stuff has not been put on in the post, including some abroad project management websites, which will be more useful in the future than right now.